In the Interest of Kc

2011 UT App 92, 259 P.3d 1062, 678 Utah Adv. Rep. 40, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 84, 2011 WL 1048254
Court of Appeals of Utah·Decided March 24, 2011·No. 20110117-CA·Published

Opinion

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

T1 A.C. (Mother) seeks to appeal the termination of her parental rights pursuant to her voluntary relinquishment entered on December 3, 2010.

T2 Pursuant to rule 52(a) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, the time for filing an appeal from a child welfare matter is fifteen days from the entry of the order appealed. See Utah R.App. P. 52(a). The filing time may be extended only by motion filed before the initial appeal time has run. See id. R. 59(a), These time frames and requirements cannot be suspended or extended. See id. R. 2.

T3 The order formally terminating Mother's parental rights was entered on December 3, 2010, after she relinquished her rights. Mother filed a letter construed as a notice of *1063 appeal on January 27, 2011, beyond the time to file an appeal. Where an appeal is not timely filed, this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal and must dismiss it. See Serrato v. Utah Transit Auth., 2000 UT App 299, ¶ 7, 13 P.3d 616.

4 4 Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of Kc, 2011 UT App 92, 259 P.3d 1062, 678 Utah Adv. Rep. 40, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 84, 2011 WL 1048254 (Utah Ct. App. 2011).

2011 UT App 92 (In the Interest of Kc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Serrato v. Utah Transit Authority
2000 UT App 299 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2000)