in the Interest of K. A. H. Jr., a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 1, 2016
Docket13-16-00334-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of K. A. H. Jr., a Child (in the Interest of K. A. H. Jr., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of K. A. H. Jr., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00334-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF K. A. H. JR., A CHILD ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Cheri Davis, appealed a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of

Nueces County, Texas. On June 30, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that

the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d).

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d). The Clerk directed appellant to file an amended notice of

appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of that notice. On

August 8, 2016, the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been corrected and

warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not cured within ten days. Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or corrected the

defect.

On July 28, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that she was delinquent

in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal

was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to

correct the defect or pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be

dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of

prosecution.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 1st day of September, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of K. A. H. Jr., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-k-a-h-jr-a-child-texapp-2016.