In the Interest Of: K. A. and A. A., Children (Mother)

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 2015
DocketA15D0316
StatusPublished

This text of In the Interest Of: K. A. and A. A., Children (Mother) (In the Interest Of: K. A. and A. A., Children (Mother)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest Of: K. A. and A. A., Children (Mother), (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 02, 01, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0316. IN THE INTEREST OF: K. A. AND A. A., CHILDREN (MOTHER).

On December 1, 2014, the mother’s parental rights to K. A. and A. A. were terminated. The mother filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied on February 6, 2015. On March 18, 2015, the mother filed an application for discretionary appeal from that order.1 We lack jurisdiction. To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). Because this application was filed 40 days after entry of the order the mother seeks to appeal, it is untimely. We thus lack jurisdiction to consider the application, which is hereby DISMISSED. The mother’s motion to extend the period for her to electronically file the application is hereby DENIED. The time requirement for filing a discretionary application is a jurisdictional requirement, and this Court is unable to accept an untimely application. See Crosson v. Conway, 291 Ga. 220 (1) (728 SE2d 617) (2012). A party may request an extension of time for filing a discretionary application, but the motion must be made on or before the application’s due date. See

1 The mother attempted to file her application for discretionary appeal on March 10, 2015, but it was returned because counsel failed to comply with Court of Appeals Rule 46 requiring counsel to electronically file all pleadings with this Court. We note, however, that even had the mother properly filed her application for discretionary appeal on March 10, 2015, her application still would have been untimely. Court of Appeals Rule 31 (g). Here, the mother’s request for an extension of time was not timely.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 04/02/2015 04/01/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crosson v. Conway
728 S.E.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
Hill v. State
420 S.E.2d 393 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In the Interest Of: K. A. and A. A., Children (Mother), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-k-a-and-a-a-children-mother-gactapp-2015.