in the Interest of J.T.G and E.R.G., Children
This text of in the Interest of J.T.G and E.R.G., Children (in the Interest of J.T.G and E.R.G., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 8, 2019
No. 04-18-00508-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF J.T.G AND E.R.G., CHILDREN,
From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-04-0312-CVA Honorable Melissa Uram-Degerolami, Judge Presiding
ORDER Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Appellant has filed a document pro se. Our records show appellant is represented by counsel in this appeal. If an appellant is represented by counsel in an appeal, the appellant is not entitled to “hybrid representation,” meaning that pro se filings present nothing for this rule on and we will only be able to respond to and rule on documents filed by appellant’s attorney. See In re S.V., No. 05-16-00519-CV, 2017 WL 3725981, at *13 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 30, 2017, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g); Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). We therefore take no action on the pro se filing.
_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of January, 2019.
___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of J.T.G and E.R.G., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jtg-and-erg-children-texapp-2019.