in the Interest of J.R.C., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 26, 2003·No. 02-03-00217-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-03-217-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R.C., A CHILD

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WICHITA COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

On July 28, 2003,  we notified appellant, in accordance with appellate rule of procedure 42.3, that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because it appears the notice of appeal was not timely filed.   Tex. R. App. P. 42.3; see Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.1(a)(1).  We stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.

No response has been filed; therefore, it is the opinion of the court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 (b); Coronado v. Farming Tech., Inc. , 994 S.W.2d 901, 901 (Tex. App.—Houston [1 st Dist.] 1999, order).  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: GARDNER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and WALKER, J.

DELIVERED: August 26, 2003

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of J.R.C., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

in the Interest of J.R.C., a Child (in the Interest of J.R.C., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coronado v. Farming Technology, Inc.
994 S.W.2d 901 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)