in the Interest of J.R., J.A.R., and D.D.R.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 14, 2009
Docket04-08-00494-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of J.R., J.A.R., and D.D.R. (in the Interest of J.R., J.A.R., and D.D.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of J.R., J.A.R., and D.D.R., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00494-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R., J.A.R., and D.D.R.

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-PA-02701 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 14, 2009

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment terminating Appellant Jose R.’s parental rights.

The trial court has found that Jose R. is not indigent and that his appellate points are frivolous.

See TEX . FAM . CODE ANN . § 263.405(b) (requiring a party intending to appeal a final termination

order to file a statement of appellate points in the trial court); id. § 263.405(d)(2)-(3) (requiring the

trial court to hold a hearing and determine whether appellant is indigent and whether the appeal is

frivolous). On November 6, 2008, we ordered Jose R. to file, not later than November 26, 2008, a

brief on the issues of whether he is indigent and whether the appeal is frivolous. See id. § 263.405(g).

Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. Therefore, on December 11, 2008, we

ordered Jose R. to file, on or before December 22, 2008, his appellant’s brief and a written response 04-08-00494-CV

reasonably explaining (1) his failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee is not significantly

injured by his failure to timely file a brief. We warned that if Jose R. failed to file a brief and the

written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX .

R. APP . P. 38.8(a). Despite our warning, neither the brief nor a written explanation was filed.

Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of J.R., J.A.R., and D.D.R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jr-jar-and-ddr-texapp-2009.