in the Interest of Joshua L. Hunt, a Minor Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of Joshua L. Hunt, a Minor Child

DecidedNovember 30, 2000

Docket13-00-00449-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of Joshua L. Hunt, a Minor Child (in the Interest of Joshua L. Hunt, a Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of Joshua L. Hunt, a Minor Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-449-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF JOSHUA L. HUNT, A CHILD

________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Dorsey and Rodriguez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RODNEY TEALER, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas, in cause number 20,506. Judgment in this cause was signed on April 12, 2000. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on May 12, 2000, but was not filed until June 15, 2000.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction on August 10, 2000. Appellant's response to appellee's motion was received on September 5, 2000.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, appellee's motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, and appellant's response thereto, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 30^th day of November, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-00-449-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF JOSHUA L. HUNT, A CHILD

________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Dorsey and Rodriguez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, RODNEY TEALER, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas, in cause number 20,506. Judgment in this cause was signed on April 12, 2000. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on May 12, 2000, but was not filed until June 15, 2000.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction on August 10, 2000. Appellant's response to appellee's motion was received on September 5, 2000.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, appellee's motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, and appellant's response thereto, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 30^th day of November, 2000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of Joshua L. Hunt, a Minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-joshua-l-hunt-a-minor-child-texapp-2000.