In the Interest of J.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of J.M. v. State

292 So. 2d 398, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7755

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 2, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1356

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 292 So. 2d 398 (In the Interest of J.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of J.M. v. State, 292 So. 2d 398, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7755 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks reversal of a delinquency order, on the ground on insufficiency of the evidence. The basis of the petition on which the order was entered was that the juvenile had engaged in shoplifting, the theft of a pair of shoes or boots from the store of J. C. Penney Co. On consideration of the record we hold the contention of the appellant that the evidence relating thereto was insufficient, is without merit. A security guard of the store who apprehended the appellant testified he observed the entire transaction, the taking of the shoes by the appellant from a counter in the store, the placing thereof in a bag and his departure from the store therewith without payment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks reversal of a delinquency order, on the ground on insufficiency of the evidence. The basis of the petition on which the order was entered was that the juvenile had engaged in shoplifting, the theft of a pair of shoes or boots from the store of J. C. Penney Co. On consideration of the record we hold the contention of the appellant that the evidence relating thereto was insufficient, is without merit. A security guard of the store who apprehended the appellant testified he observed the entire transaction, the taking of the shoes by the appellant from a counter in the store, the placing thereof in a bag and his departure from the store therewith without payment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 So. 2d 398, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jm-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack