In the Interest of J.L.N.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of J.L.N.

442 S.W.3d 920, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1054, 2014 WL 4704599

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 23, 2014

DocketNo. ED 101162

StatusPublished

This text of 442 S.W.3d 920 (In the Interest of J.L.N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of J.L.N., 442 S.W.3d 920, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1054, 2014 WL 4704599 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

I.Y. (Mother) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her son J.L.N. (Child), contending there was insufficient evidence supporting the grounds for termination and the court’s finding that termination was in the best interests of the child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment that grounds for [921]*921termination of Mother’s parental rights exist is supported by substantial evidence and that such termination is in Child’s best interest was not an abuse of discretion. In re E.F.B.D., 245 S.W.3d 316, 319 (Mo.App. S.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

I.Y. (Mother) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her son J.L.N. (Child), contending there was insufficient evidence supporting the grounds for termination and the court’s finding that termination was in the best interests of the child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment that grounds for [921]*921termination of Mother’s parental rights exist is supported by substantial evidence and that such termination is in Child’s best interest was not an abuse of discretion. In re E.F.B.D., 245 S.W.3d 316, 319 (Mo.App. S.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 S.W.3d 920, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1054, 2014 WL 4704599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jln-moctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack