In the Interest of J.L.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of J.L.C.

416 S.W.3d 349, 2013 WL 6667563, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1491

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 2013·No. No. ED 99680·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

V.M.C. (“Mother”) appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights to J.L.C., N.R.C., J.S.C, and R.D.C. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mother’s motion for a continuance.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

V.M.C. (“Mother”) appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights to J.L.C., N.R.C., J.S.C, and R.D.C. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mother’s motion for a continuance.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of J.L.C., 416 S.W.3d 349, 2013 WL 6667563, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1491 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

416 S.W.3d 349 (In the Interest of J.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.