in the Interest of J.K.C., C.H.-N.C., and I.N.-R.C., Minor Children

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of J.K.C., C.H.-N.C., and I.N.-R.C., Minor Children

DecidedJuly 18, 2007

Docket12-07-00205-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of J.K.C., C.H.-N.C., and I.N.-R.C., Minor Children (in the Interest of J.K.C., C.H.-N.C., and I.N.-R.C., Minor Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of J.K.C., C.H.-N.C., and I.N.-R.C., Minor Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM HEADING

NO. 12-07-00205-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§ APPEAL FROM THE

IN THE INTEREST OF J.K.C.,

C.H.-N.C., AND I.N.-R.C., § COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF

MINOR CHILDREN

§ ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., May 17, 2007. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. On June 7, 2007, this court notified Appellant that she should file a docketing statement immediately if she had not already done so. On the same date, by separate letter, this court notified Appellant that the filing fee was due on or before June 18, 2007.

Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in our June 7, 2007 letter, this court issued a second notice on June 27, 2007 advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice also advised Appellant that the filing fee in the appeal was due to have been paid on or before June 18, 2007, but had not been received. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement and filing fee were filed on or before July 9, 2007, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement and the filing fee have passed, and Appellant has not complied with the court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered July 18, 2007.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM HEADING

NO. 12-07-00205-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§ APPEAL FROM THE

IN THE INTEREST OF J.K.C.,

C.H.-N.C., AND I.N.-R.C., § COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF

MINOR CHILDREN

§ ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., May 17, 2007. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. On June 7, 2007, this court notified Appellant that she should file a docketing statement immediately if she had not already done so. On the same date, by separate letter, this court notified Appellant that the filing fee was due on or before June 18, 2007.

Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in our June 7, 2007 letter, this court issued a second notice on June 27, 2007 advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice also advised Appellant that the filing fee in the appeal was due to have been paid on or before June 18, 2007, but had not been received. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement and filing fee were filed on or before July 9, 2007, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement and the filing fee have passed, and Appellant has not complied with the court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered July 18, 2007.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of J.K.C., C.H.-N.C., and I.N.-R.C., Minor Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jkc-ch-nc-and-in-rc-minor-child-texapp-2007.