in the Interest of J.J.W.S., a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 1, 2021
Docket05-21-00715-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of J.J.W.S., a Child (in the Interest of J.J.W.S., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of J.J.W.S., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 1, 2021

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00715-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.W.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-01-19817

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns

Before the Court is appellant’s motion for extension of time to file her notice

of appeal from the trial court’s April 20, 2021 final order. Under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 26.3, an appellate court may grant a motion for extension of

time to file a notice of appeal if, in part, the notice of appeal is filed within fifteen

days of the deadline prescribed by rule 26.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Because

appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, the rule 26.1 deadline was July 19,

2021, ninety days after the complained-of order was signed, and the deadline under

rule 26.3 was August 3, 2021. See id. 26.1(a), 26.3. Appellant did not file her notice

of appeal, however, until August 20th. In the extension motion, appellant acknowledges the July 19th deadline but

asserts she did not receive notice of the final order until May 5th and therefore, the

deadlines run from that date, not the date of the final order. Deadlines run from the

date of notice, however, only if notice is received more than twenty days after the

date of judgment.1 See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(4); TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(a). Because

notice here was received within fifteen days, the deadlines were not altered.

Accordingly, because the notice of appeal was not filed by August 3rd, we deny the

extension motion and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(a); Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d 542, 545

(Tex. App.–Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (timely filing of notice of appeal is

jurisdictional).

/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

210715F.P05

1 In no event though, may the deadlines run more than ninety days after the original judgment or appealable order was signed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(4); TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2(a). –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.W.S., A On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial CHILD District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-01-19817. No. 05-21-00715-CV Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered September 1, 2021.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C.
302 S.W.3d 542 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of J.J.W.S., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jjws-a-child-texapp-2021.