In the Interest of J.J.N. v. Juvenile Officer

315 S.W.3d 438, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 987, 2010 WL 2899803
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 27, 2010·No. WD 71404·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*439 Order

PER CURIAM:

J.J.N. appeals the Family Court’s assumption of jurisdiction over him as a result of his careless and imprudent driving and driving without a license. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting his statements into evidence because the police officer did not provide Miranda, warnings before J.J.N. told the police officer that he was the driver of the vehicle. Secondly, he contends that the trial court erred in finding sufficient evidence of careless and imprudent driving. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of J.J.N. v. Juvenile Officer, 315 S.W.3d 438, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 987, 2010 WL 2899803 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

315 S.W.3d 438 (In the Interest of J.J.N. v. Juvenile Officer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Briggs v. State
315 S.W.3d 438 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)