In the Interest of J.J.N. v. Juvenile Officer
Opinion
*439 Order
J.J.N. appeals the Family Court’s assumption of jurisdiction over him as a result of his careless and imprudent driving and driving without a license. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting his statements into evidence because the police officer did not provide Miranda, warnings before J.J.N. told the police officer that he was the driver of the vehicle. Secondly, he contends that the trial court erred in finding sufficient evidence of careless and imprudent driving. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
315 S.W.3d 438 (In the Interest of J.J.N. v. Juvenile Officer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.