In the Interest of: J.J.M., of: J.J.M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 1, 2020·No. 594 MAL 2019 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.J.M., A MINOR : No. 594 MAL 2019 : :

PETITION OF: J.J.M., A MINOR : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court misapprehended controlling facts, in a case of first

impression in this Commonwealth, when concluding that the terroristic threats statute,

requiring only a conviction based upon recklessness, did not violate [Petitioner’s] First

Amendment right under the United States Constitution to free speech?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of: J.J.M., of: J.J.M., (Pa. 2020).

In the Interest of: J.J.M., of: J.J.M. (In the Interest of: J.J.M., of: J.J.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.