In the Interest of J.J.
This text of 542 So. 2d 1070 (In the Interest of J.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a review of the evidence in the record, we affirm the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency for grand theft. We note that the error in admitting the irrelevant contents of an unidentified telephone call was harmless. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). However, the state concedes that appellant’s additional adjudication for petty theft should be reversed. See Hearn v. State, 55 So.2d 559 (Fla.1951). The order of delinquency is therefore reversed and remanded for modification.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
542 So. 2d 1070, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1211, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jj-fladistctapp-1989.