In the Interest of J.J.

542 So. 2d 1070, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1211, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2694
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1095
StatusPublished

This text of 542 So. 2d 1070 (In the Interest of J.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of J.J., 542 So. 2d 1070, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1211, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2694 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the evidence in the record, we affirm the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency for grand theft. We note that the error in admitting the irrelevant contents of an unidentified telephone call was harmless. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). However, the state concedes that appellant’s additional adjudication for petty theft should be reversed. See Hearn v. State, 55 So.2d 559 (Fla.1951). The order of delinquency is therefore reversed and remanded for modification.

HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearn v. State
55 So. 2d 559 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 1070, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1211, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jj-fladistctapp-1989.