In the Interest of J.E.A. v. Juvenille Officer

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of J.E.A. v. Juvenille Officer

391 S.W.3d 929, 2013 WL 816088, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 289

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 2013·No. No. WD 75222·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

J.E.A. appeals the circuit court’s judgment finding that he was in need of the care and treatment of the Juvenile Court because he had committed an act, which if committed by an adult, would have constituted deviate sexual assault, a Class C felony. J.E.A. argues (1) that the evidence was insufficient to prove he acted with the requisite mens rea, (2) that the trial court erred in admitting T.S.A.’s out-of-court statements from 2011 because they were not contained in the State’s notice as required by section 491.075, and (3) that the trial court erred in admitting T.S.A.’s out-of-court statements because they lacked sufficient reliability.

We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

J.E.A. appeals the circuit court’s judgment finding that he was in need of the care and treatment of the Juvenile Court because he had committed an act, which if committed by an adult, would have constituted deviate sexual assault, a Class C felony. J.E.A. argues (1) that the evidence was insufficient to prove he acted with the requisite mens rea, (2) that the trial court erred in admitting T.S.A.’s out-of-court statements from 2011 because they were not contained in the State’s notice as required by section 491.075, and (3) that the trial court erred in admitting T.S.A.’s out-of-court statements because they lacked sufficient reliability.

We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of J.E.A. v. Juvenille Officer, 391 S.W.3d 929, 2013 WL 816088, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 289 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 929 (In the Interest of J.E.A. v. Juvenille Officer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.