In the Interest of J.E. v. State

568 So. 2d 547, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8304, 1990 WL 164980
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 1990
DocketNo. 90-1574
StatusPublished

This text of 568 So. 2d 547 (In the Interest of J.E. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of J.E. v. State, 568 So. 2d 547, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8304, 1990 WL 164980 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes there was insufficient proof of value to prove the offense of grand theft under Taylor v. State, 425 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Accord[548]*548ingly, we reverse and remand for an adjudication of delinquency for the lesser offense of petit theft.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., and BEN C. WILLIS (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
425 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
568 So. 2d 547, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8304, 1990 WL 164980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-je-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.