in the Interest of J.C.W., III, Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 7, 2009
Docket04-09-00219-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of J.C.W., III, Children (in the Interest of J.C.W., III, Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of J.C.W., III, Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00219-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C.W., III, et al., Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-PA-00045 Honorable Charles Montemayor, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 7, 2009

AFFIRMED

After the trial court terminated his parental rights, Joseph C. W. appealed the trial court’s

order determining that an appeal of the termination order would be frivolous. See TEX . FAM . CODE

ANN . § 263.405(g) (Vernon 2008). Joseph’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief

containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable

grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief

meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No.

04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.)

(applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights) (mem. op.); see also In

re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 774, 775 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, order) (same). 04-09-00219-CV

Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to Joseph who was advised of his

right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing

the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court

is therefore affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In the Interest of K.M.
98 S.W.3d 774 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of J.C.W., III, Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jcw-iii-children-texapp-2009.