In the Interest of J.C.V. v. M.R-A.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of J.C.V. v. M.R-A.C.

496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994050, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 531

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 24, 2016

DocketWD 79027

StatusPublished

This text of 496 S.W.3d 634 (In the Interest of J.C.V. v. M.R-A.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of J.C.V. v. M.R-A.C., 496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994050, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 531 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant M.R-A.C. (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Vernon County, which terminated her parental rights with respect to her son, J.C.V., II. On appeal, Mother argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish grounds for termination under §§ 211.447.5(2) (abuse and neglect) and 211.447.5(3) (failure to rectify), RSMo, or to establish that termination was in the child’s best interests. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant M.R-A.C. (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Vernon County, which terminated her parental rights with respect to her son, J.C.V., II. On appeal, Mother argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish grounds for termination under §§ 211.447.5(2) (abuse and neglect) and 211.447.5(3) (failure to rectify), RSMo, or to establish that termination was in the child’s best interests. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994050, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jcv-v-mr-ac-moctapp-2016.