In the Interest of J.C.V. v. M.R-A.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of J.C.V. v. M.R-A.C.

496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994050, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 531

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 24, 2016·No. WD 79027·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant M.R-A.C. (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Vernon County, which terminated her parental rights with respect to her son, J.C.V., II. On appeal, Mother argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish grounds for termination under §§ 211.447.5(2) (abuse and neglect) and 211.447.5(3) (failure to rectify), RSMo, or to establish that termination was in the child’s best interests. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant M.R-A.C. (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Vernon County, which terminated her parental rights with respect to her son, J.C.V., II. On appeal, Mother argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish grounds for termination under §§ 211.447.5(2) (abuse and neglect) and 211.447.5(3) (failure to rectify), RSMo, or to establish that termination was in the child’s best interests. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of J.C.V. v. M.R-A.C., 496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994050, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 531 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

496 S.W.3d 634 (In the Interest of J.C.V. v. M.R-A.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.