in the Interest of J.C.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00693-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF J.C.
From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-PA-01992 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 20, 2011
AFFIRMED, MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
After the trial court terminated her parental rights to J.C., appellant T.L. appealed the trial
court’s order determining that an appeal of the termination order would be frivolous. See TEX.
FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(g) (West 2008). 1 Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief
containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). See In the Interest of R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from
termination of parental rights). Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief. Additionally,
1 To protect the privacy of the parties in this case, we identify the parent and child by initials only. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (West 2008). 04-10-00693-CV
appellant was informed of her right to review the record and advised of her right to file a pro se
brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The
judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State,
954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176,
177 n. 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Karen Angelini, Justice
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of J.C. (in the Interest of J.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.