In the Interest of J.C., a Child v. the State of Texas
This text of In the Interest of J.C., a Child v. the State of Texas (In the Interest of J.C., a Child v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00249-CV ___________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 442nd District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-01206-442
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Mother, 1 proceeding pro se, attempts to appeal from the trial court’s
“Temporary Orders in Suit to Modify Parent–Child Relationship.” We dismiss the
appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments and from certain
interlocutory orders made immediately appealable by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con
Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.
§ 51.014(a) (listing appealable interlocutory orders). Without a final judgment or an
appealable interlocutory order, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal, and we must
dismiss it. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195, 200. Temporary orders entered in a suit
affecting the parent–child relationship are not appealable interlocutory orders. Tex.
Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001(e); see In re K.S., No. 02-20-00409-CV, 2021 WL 126596, at
*1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 14, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal for
want of jurisdiction because temporary orders entered in suit affecting parent–child
relationship not immediately appealable).
We notified Mother that we questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal
because the temporary-orders ruling from which she attempts to appeal does not
appear to be a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order. We warned
Mother that unless she filed a response by June 30, 2025, showing grounds for
In suits affecting the parent–child relationship, we use initials or aliases for the 1
names of the children and their parents. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(2).
2 continuing the appeal, this appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. We did not receive a response.
Because the temporary orders from which Mother attempts to appeal are
neither final nor immediately appealable, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See
Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195, 200. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: July 24, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of J.C., a Child v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-jc-a-child-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.