in the Interest of J. T., Minor Child
This text of in the Interest of J. T., Minor Child (in the Interest of J. T., Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00041-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF J. T., MINOR CHILD ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras
Appellant Alexis Renee Trevino attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment
entered by the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas in cause number CW-0249-
16-J. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that there was no
final, appealable judgment dated January 17, 2019. On January 29, 2019, the Clerk of
this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the
defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that,
if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the
Court’s notice.
The Hidalgo County Clerk’s Office has informed this Court that no judgment was
entered on January 17, 2019. In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only
have jurisdiction to review final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by
statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to
correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for
want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c).
DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice
Delivered and filed the 28th day of February, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of J. T., Minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-j-t-minor-child-texapp-2019.