in the Interest of J. S. a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of J. S. a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services

DecidedApril 9, 2019

Docket01-19-00146-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of J. S. a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services (in the Interest of J. S. a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of J. S. a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of J. S., A Child

Appellate case number: 01-19-00146-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-00409J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”) for both the mother and the father of the child, J.S. On April 4, 2019, appointed counsel for the father, H.L.S., filed his appellant’s brief. On April 5, 2019, Michellé Placzek, appointed counsel for the mother, A.W.H., filed an unopposed motion for a 14-day extension of time to file appellant A.W.H.’s brief, which was due on April 1, 2019.

Appeals in parental termination cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed, so far as reasonably possible. See TEX. ST. JUD. ADMIN. R. 6.2(a) (West 2017). Here, the first notice of appeal was timely filed on February 25, 2019, in the trial court from the February 7, 2019 final decree for termination by appointed counsel for the father, H.L.S., setting the 180-day compliance deadline for August 23, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). Although this is appellant A.W.H.’s first motion and it is unopposed, the accelerated schedule in termination cases requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines and greater scrutiny of extensions.

Appellant A.W.H.’s counsel contends that an extension is needed “because she incorrectly calculated the deadline and therefore incorrectly docketed the date on her calendar.” Thus, counsel requests a 14-day extension of time to file appellant A.W.H.’s brief until April 15, 2019.

Accordingly, appellant A.W.H.’s motion for an extension of time is GRANTED until April 15, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes__________ x Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: _April 9, 2019______

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of J. S., A Child

Appellate case number: 01-19-00146-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-00409J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”) for both the mother and the father of the child, J.S. On April 4, 2019, appointed counsel for the father, H.L.S., filed his appellant’s brief. On April 5, 2019, Michellé Placzek, appointed counsel for the mother, A.W.H., filed an unopposed motion for a 14-day extension of time to file appellant A.W.H.’s brief, which was due on April 1, 2019.

Appeals in parental termination cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed, so far as reasonably possible. See TEX. ST. JUD. ADMIN. R. 6.2(a) (West 2017). Here, the first notice of appeal was timely filed on February 25, 2019, in the trial court from the February 7, 2019 final decree for termination by appointed counsel for the father, H.L.S., setting the 180-day compliance deadline for August 23, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). Although this is appellant A.W.H.’s first motion and it is unopposed, the accelerated schedule in termination cases requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines and greater scrutiny of extensions.

Appellant A.W.H.’s counsel contends that an extension is needed “because she incorrectly calculated the deadline and therefore incorrectly docketed the date on her calendar.” Thus, counsel requests a 14-day extension of time to file appellant A.W.H.’s brief until April 15, 2019.

Accordingly, appellant A.W.H.’s motion for an extension of time is GRANTED until April 15, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes__________ x Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: _April 9, 2019______

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of J. S. a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-j-s-a-child-v-department-of-family-and-protective-texapp-2019.