in the Interest of J. R., C. M. R. C., and D.C., Minor Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 25, 2022
Docket13-22-00253-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of J. R., C. M. R. C., and D.C., Minor Children (in the Interest of J. R., C. M. R. C., and D.C., Minor Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of J. R., C. M. R. C., and D.C., Minor Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00253-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R., C.M.R.C., AND D.C., MINOR CHILDREN

On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hildalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Order Per Curiam This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. On July 22, 2022,

appellant filed a first motion of extension of time to file a brief. Appellant’s brief was due

on July 18, 2022. Appellant has requested a twenty-one-day extension to file a brief from

the date of this motion.

Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals but include additional expedited deadlines and procedures. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). The

intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that

these appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of

appeal is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). Given the nature of these cases and the

shortened appellate deadlines, we limit the request to one ten-day extension of time

absent truly extraordinary circumstances. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

This Court, having fully examined and considered appellant’s motion is of the

opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file

his brief should be granted in part with order. The Court, however, requires strict

adherence to the briefing rules in appeals of parental termination cases, such as this

appeal, and looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by such extension requests. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6; see also id. at R. 28.4.

The Court GRANTS in part appellant’s first motion for extension of time. This

motion is GRANTED insofar as the Court will extend appellant’s deadline to file

appellant’s brief to August 1, 2022. The Court DENIES appellant’s request for a twenty-

one-day extension. Further motions for extension of time will not be favorably entertained

by this Court, absent extraordinary circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 25th day of July, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of J. R., C. M. R. C., and D.C., Minor Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-j-r-c-m-r-c-and-dc-minor-children-texapp-2022.