in the Interest of J. O. v. N. J. v. K. E. v. C. v. E. v. and J. v. Children
This text of in the Interest of J. O. v. N. J. v. K. E. v. C. v. E. v. and J. v. Children (in the Interest of J. O. v. N. J. v. K. E. v. C. v. E. v. and J. v. Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ No. 08-09-00173-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.O.V., N.J.V., § K.E.V., C.V., E.V., and J.V., children. Appeal from the § 65th District Court § of El Paso County, Texas § (TC# 2007CM6716) §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX .R.APP .P. 42.3(a). Finding that no notice of appeal was
filed, we will dismiss the appeal.
A civil appeal is perfected when the notice of appeal is filed. TEX .R.APP .P. 26.1; see
Restrepo v. First Nat’l Bank of Dona Ana County, N.M., 892 S.W.2d 237, 238 (Tex.App.–El Paso
1995, no writ) (applying former TEX .R.APP .P. 40(a)(1)). In accelerated cases such as this one, the
notice of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the judgment is signed. TEX .R.APP .P.
26.1(b). The filing of a motion for new trial does not extend the time to perfect the appeal in
accelerated cases, nor does a motion to modify the judgment. TEX .R.APP .P. 28.1(b); In re K.A.F.,
160 S.W.3d 923, 927 (Tex. 2005). A notice of appeal is considered timely if filed within fifteen days
of the due date and accompanied by a reasonable explanation for the failure to file on the due date.
Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Unless a timely notice of appeal has been
filed, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood, 58 S.W.3d 732, 737-
38 (Tex. 2001). The record reflects that the trial court entered its judgment on June 8, 2009, and Appellant
received notice of the signing of the final judgment on June 23, 2009. On June 29, 2009, Appellant
filed a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal, contending that additional time was needed
to file an affidavit of indigence. This Court granted the motion on July 1, 2009, but ordered that the
notice of appeal and affidavit of indigence be filed by July 13, 2009. Neither a notice of appeal nor
affidavit of indigence has been filed.
In Grand Praire, the Supreme Court held that a court of appeals may not dismiss an appeal
in which the appellant filed the wrong instrument required to perfect the appeal without giving the
appellant an opportunity to correct the error, as long as the instrument was timely filed in a bona fide
attempt to invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction. Grand Prairie Indep. Sch. Dist. v. S. Parts
Imps., Inc., 813 S.W.2d 499, 500 (Tex. 1991). Assuming Appellant’s motion to extend time to file
the notice of appeal and affidavit of indigence was a bona fide attempt to invoke this Court’s
jurisdiction, Appellant, as discussed above, was given the opportunity to file a correct notice of
appeal and affidavit of indigence. Appellant has not done so. Absent a notice of appeal, we lack
jurisdiction over the appeal. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice September 23, 2009
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of J. O. v. N. J. v. K. E. v. C. v. E. v. and J. v. Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-j-o-v-n-j-v-k-e-v-c-v-e-v-and-j-texapp-2009.