In the Interest of I.P., IV

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of I.P., IV

517 S.W.3d 676, 2017 WL 1881131, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 397

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104716

StatusPublished

This text of 517 S.W.3d 676 (In the Interest of I.P., IV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of I.P., IV, 517 S.W.3d 676, 2017 WL 1881131, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 397 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The mother, Marisha Gordon, challenges the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis terminating her parental rights to the child, I.P., who was 13 years old at the time of judgment.¹ Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The mother, Marisha Gordon, challenges the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis terminating her parental rights to the child, I.P., who was 13 years old at the time of judgment.¹ Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

517 S.W.3d 676, 2017 WL 1881131, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ip-iv-moctapp-2017.