In the Interest of I.P., IV

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of I.P., IV

517 S.W.3d 676, 2017 WL 1881131, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 397

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 2017·No. No. ED 104716·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The mother, Marisha Gordon, challenges the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis terminating her parental rights to the child, I.P., who was 13 years old at the time of judgment.¹ Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The mother, Marisha Gordon, challenges the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis terminating her parental rights to the child, I.P., who was 13 years old at the time of judgment.¹ Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Footnotes

In the Interest of I.P., IV, 517 S.W.3d 676, 2017 WL 1881131, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 397 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

517 S.W.3d 676 (In the Interest of I.P., IV) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.