in the Interest of I.D.C., a Child
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-18-00092-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF I.D.C., A CHILD
From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas Trial Court No. CV315-17
ORDER
Appellant has filed a motion to alter or amend judgment, which the Court
construes as a motion for rehearing under Rule 49.1 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1.
Appellant has also filed a motion to amend or supplement his motion for
rehearing. Appellant’s motion to amend or supplement is granted by the Court.
The document construed as a motion for rehearing, as amended or supplemented
by the foregoing grant of the motion to amend or supplement it, is denied by the Court. PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motions granted and denied Order issued and filed January 2, 2019
In re I.D.C. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in the Interest of I.D.C., a Child (in the Interest of I.D.C., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.