in the Interest of H.M.L., a Child
This text of in the Interest of H.M.L., a Child (in the Interest of H.M.L., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered January 24, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00069-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF H.M.L., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417-55477-2017
ORDER By notice of restricted appeal filed January 17, 2019, Father challenges the trial court’s
September 11, 2018 divorce decree that also terminated his parental rights to H.M.L. Mother has
filed an objection to the appeal, asserting the appeal should be dismissed. Mother notes that
under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 30, which governs restricted appeals, a party may file a
restricted appeal when, among other requirements, the party did not timely file a post-judgment
motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 30. Mother further notes, and the notice of restricted appeal itself
recites, that Father timely filed a motion for new trial.
The requirements of a restricted appeal are jurisdictional and failure to meet any of them
bars a party from seeking appellate review under rule 30. See Lab. Corp. of Am. v. Mid-Town
Surgical Ctr., Inc., 16 S.W.3d 527, 528 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2000, no pet.) (dismissing for want
of jurisdiction restricted appeal where appellant timely filed post-judgment motion). Accordingly, we ORDER Father to file any response to Mother’s objection no later than
February 15, 2019.
Pending our ruling on Mother’s objection, the deadline for filing appellant’s brief on the
merits is suspended. We will reset the deadline should we determine we have jurisdiction over
the appeal. Should we determine we lack jurisdiction, we will dismiss the appeal without further
notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Mid-Town Surgical Ctr., 16 S.W.3d at 528.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to include a copy of Mother’s objection with this
order.
/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of H.M.L., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-hml-a-child-texapp-2019.