in the Interest of H.M.J., a Child
This text of in the Interest of H.M.J., a Child (in the Interest of H.M.J., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-18-00009-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF H.M.J., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 86319
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER
On February 6, 2018, the trial court presided over a parental-rights termination proceeding
in which The Department of Family and Protective Services (the Department) sought to terminate
the parental rights of Mother and Father to their child, H.M.J.1 Having been found indigent by the
trial court, A.S. was represented in the trial court by appointed counsel, Zachary Ressler. On
February 14, 2018, the trial court entered an order terminating the parent-child relationship
between H.M.J. and her parents. Prior to the entry of the order, however, Ressler filed, on
February 9, 2014, a notice of appeal on Mother’s behalf. In the trial court’s termination order, the
court relieved Ressler “of all duties based on a finding of good cause.” Although the trial court
appointed counsel to represent Father on appeal, it does not appear that it appointed counsel to
represent Mother on appeal. Further, Ressler has advised this Court that he does not wish to
represent Mother on appeal.
Section 107.013(a) of the Texas Family Code mandates the appointment of an attorney ad
litem for an indigent parent in a suit filed by a governmental entity seeking termination of the
parent-child relationship. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013(a) (West Supp. 2017). Further,
Section 107.013(e) provides that when a parent is found to be indigent by the trial court in a case
brought by a governmental entity for the termination of the parent-child relationship, that parent
is presumed to remain indigent in any subsequent appeal. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013(e)
(West Supp. 2017). Because Mother was determined by the trial court to be indigent, she is
1 We refer to H.M.J.’s mother as “Mother” and to her father as “Father” to protect the identity of the minor child who is the subject of this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8.
2 presumed to remain indigent for purposes of this appeal. Accordingly, Mother is entitled to be
represented on appeal by appointed counsel.
Consequently, we abate this appeal to the trial court for the appointment of counsel to
represent Mother in this appeal. The appointment shall be made within five days of the date of
this order. The order appointing counsel shall be sent to this Court in the form of a supplemental
clerk’s record within five days of the date of the appointment.
Because this case involves an appeal from the termination of parental rights, this matter
should be expedited at all levels.
All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental
clerk’s record mandated by this order. We will establish a new briefing schedule on the return of
this Court’s jurisdiction over these matters.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: March 27, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of H.M.J., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-hmj-a-child-texapp-2018.