in the Interest of H.J.S., Minor Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 13, 2022
Docket05-22-00799-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of H.J.S., Minor Child (in the Interest of H.J.S., Minor Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of H.J.S., Minor Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 13, 2022

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00799-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.J.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-25137

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns This appeal challenges an order confirming child support arrearage and

reducing the arrearage to judgment. The order was signed by an associate judge

following a trial on the merits.

Generally, under Texas Family Code sections 201.013 and 201.016, the

applicable associate judge provisions, an associate judge’s order or judgment

becomes the order or judgment of the referring court and is appealable to an appellate

court only on the referring court’s signing the order or judgment. See TEX. FAM.

CODE ANN. §§ 201.013(b), 201.016(b). However, an associate judge’s order or

judgment may be directly appealed to an appellate court if, prior to the start of the

hearing conducted by the associate judge, the parties waive, in writing, their right to a de novo hearing before the referring court. See id. § 201.016(c); see also id §

201.007(a)(16) (allowing associate judge to render and sign final order where parties

waive right to de novo hearing in writing).

Because the record here did not reflect the parties waived their right to a de

novo hearing and the order is signed by the associate judge only, we questioned our

jurisdiction over the appeal and directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our

concern. Although we cautioned appellant that failure to comply could result in

dismissal of the appeal without further notice, see TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c), more

than ten days have passed and appellant has not complied. Accordingly, on the

record before us, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a).

/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

220799F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF H.J.S., On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial MINOR CHILD District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-25137. No. 05-22-00799-CV Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Avery Nicole Schultz recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Burke Caton Schultz.

Judgment entered December 13, 2022

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 201.013
Texas FA § 201.013(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of H.J.S., Minor Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-hjs-minor-child-texapp-2022.