In the Interest of H.B.E.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of H.B.E.

484 So. 2d 653, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 678, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6919

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1986·No. No. 85-1120·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand on the authority of J.D.B. v. State, 463 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Although we reverse, we acknowledge our agreement with the view of the trial court that it would make more sense if the statutory sentencing scheme for juveniles who commit a trespass, like the statutory scheme for adults, permitted a longer term of probation than the maximum sixty-day period for imprisonment now provided in Sections 39.11(l)(a)(l) and 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (1983). However, it is up to the legislature to correct this apparent inconsistency.

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand on the authority of J.D.B. v. State, 463 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Although we reverse, we acknowledge our agreement with the view of the trial court that it would make more sense if the statutory sentencing scheme for juveniles who commit a trespass, like the statutory scheme for adults, permitted a longer term of probation than the maximum sixty-day period for imprisonment now provided in Sections 39.11(l)(a)(l) and 39.11(3), Florida Statutes (1983). However, it is up to the legislature to correct this apparent inconsistency.

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

In the Interest of H.B.E., 484 So. 2d 653, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 678, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6919 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

484 So. 2d 653 (In the Interest of H.B.E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related