In the Interest of H. S.

405 S.E.2d 323, 199 Ga. App. 481, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 500
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 1, 1991
DocketA91A0258
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 405 S.E.2d 323 (In the Interest of H. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of H. S., 405 S.E.2d 323, 199 Ga. App. 481, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 500 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

A delinquency petition was filed, alleging that appellant “did unlawfully, maliciously cause bodily harm to [the victim] by seriously disfiguring a member of his body, to wit: his head, in violation of OCGA § 16-5-24.” A hearing on this petition was held and appellant appeals from the juvenile court’s adjudication of delinquency.

Only the general grounds are raised in related enumerations of error. In juvenile proceedings, “the standard of proof on charges of a criminal nature is the same as that used in criminal proceedings against adults — proof must be beyond a reasonable doubt. [Cits.]” M. W. W. v. State of Ga., 136 Ga. App. 472, 474 (221 SE2d 669) (1975). The evidence in the instant case authorized a finding that, as the result of an unprovoked beating administered by appellant, the victim suffered a broken nose and a laceration to the scalp requiring several stitches. Accordingly, the evidence authorized a finding that the victim had incurred a serious disfigurement to his head as the result of being intentionally struck by appellant. Penland v. State, 229 Ga. 256 (1) (190 SE2d 900) (1972); Price v. State, 160 Ga. App. 245 (1) (286 SE2d 744) (1981); Thompson v. State, 156 Ga. App. 1 (1) (273 SE2d 894) (1980); Miller v. State, 155 Ga. App. 54, 55 (4) (270 SE2d 466) (1980); Rollins v. State, 154 Ga. App. 585, 588 (5) (269 SE2d 81) (1980). “Black’s Law Dictionary defines ‘disfigurement’ as ‘that which impairs or injures . . . the appearance of a person . . .,’ and defines ‘serious’ as ‘grave, (or) great.’ ” Baker v. State, 246 Ga. 317, 318 (2) (271 SE2d 360) (1980). To constitute the crime of aggravated battery, there is no requirement that, in addition to being “serious,” the disfigurement of á victim be permanent. The evidence in this case demonstrates, at the very least, “serious temporary disfigurement to the victim. . . .” (Emphasis supplied.) Baker v. State, 245 Ga. 657, 667 (6) (266 SE2d 477) (1980). The juvenile court, as the trior of fact, was authorized to find from the evidence proof of appellant’s delinquency beyond a reasonable doubt and the general grounds are, therefore, without merit. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur. *482 Laurens C. Lee, for appellant. Ralph M. Walke, District Attorney, L. Craig Fraser, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WEAVER v. the STATE.
830 S.E.2d 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)
Bray v. the State
768 S.E.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
MacK v. State
669 S.E.2d 487 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Meeks v. State
636 S.E.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Bajjani v. Gwinnett County School District
630 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Johnson v. State
579 S.E.2d 809 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
Williams v. State
546 S.E.2d 74 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Silvers v. State
538 S.E.2d 135 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Ganas v. State
537 S.E.2d 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Scott v. State
532 S.E.2d 141 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Perkins v. State
505 S.E.2d 16 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)
McGlohon v. State
506 S.E.2d 886 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Childers v. State
491 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Levin v. State
473 S.E.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Keef v. State
469 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Lewis v. State
452 S.E.2d 228 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Thornton v. State
449 S.E.2d 98 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 S.E.2d 323, 199 Ga. App. 481, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-h-s-gactapp-1991.