in the Interest of G.C.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 17, 2005
• Docket: 14-04-00167-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 17, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 17, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-00167-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.C.

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 03-10361J

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the misdemeanor offense of assault.  On February 17, 2004, the trial court sentenced appellant to commitment in the Texas Youth Commission for an indeterminate time, not to exceed the time when appellant turns 21 years of age or is duly discharged.  Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed February 17, 2005.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.  

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).