In the Interest of Gauer Ex Rel. Fox v. Petzold
This text of 195 S.W.3d 20 (In the Interest of Gauer Ex Rel. Fox v. Petzold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Amanda Ann Gauer, by next friend Carrie D. Fox, and Carrie D. Fox appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding $5,000 in retroactive child support and not awarding attorney’s fees. 1
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. Appellants' Motion to Strike Respondent's Brief is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 S.W.3d 20, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2006 WL 1737414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-gauer-ex-rel-fox-v-petzold-moctapp-2006.