In the Interest of Gauer Ex Rel. Fox v. Petzold

195 S.W.3d 20, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2006 WL 1737414
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 27, 2006
DocketED 86979
StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.W.3d 20 (In the Interest of Gauer Ex Rel. Fox v. Petzold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of Gauer Ex Rel. Fox v. Petzold, 195 S.W.3d 20, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2006 WL 1737414 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amanda Ann Gauer, by next friend Carrie D. Fox, and Carrie D. Fox appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding $5,000 in retroactive child support and not awarding attorney’s fees. 1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Appellants' Motion to Strike Respondent's Brief is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pope v. ROBERTS CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES
195 S.W.3d 20 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.W.3d 20, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2006 WL 1737414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-gauer-ex-rel-fox-v-petzold-moctapp-2006.