In the Interest of Gauer Ex Rel. Fox v. Petzold

195 S.W.3d 20, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2006 WL 1737414
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 27, 2006·No. ED 86979·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amanda Ann Gauer, by next friend Carrie D. Fox, and Carrie D. Fox appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding $5,000 in retroactive child support and not awarding attorney’s fees. 1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Appellants' Motion to Strike Respondent's Brief is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of Gauer Ex Rel. Fox v. Petzold, 195 S.W.3d 20, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2006 WL 1737414 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

195 S.W.3d 20 (In the Interest of Gauer Ex Rel. Fox v. Petzold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. ROBERTS CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES
195 S.W.3d 20 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)