In the Interest of G. J. S. v. State

393 So. 2d 14, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17752
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1980·No. No. 80-200·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

The inherent nature of a mobile automobile constitutes an exigent circumstance making its search upon probable cause but without a warrant constitutionally reasonable. Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); Carroll v. U. S., 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925); State v. Francoeur, 387 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); State v. Rapp, 389 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) [1980 F.L.W. 2075], The trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress based on its finding of probable cause comes to this court with a presumption of correctness. McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410, 412 (Fla.1978). Appellant has failed to overcome that presumption in this case. The final judgment and sentence is

AFFIRMED.

COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of G. J. S. v. State, 393 So. 2d 14, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

393 So. 2d 14 (In the Interest of G. J. S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dukes v. State
503 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Adamosky
407 So. 2d 983 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Haugee
402 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)