In the Interest of F.D.E. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of F.D.E. v. State

510 So. 2d 1076, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1827, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9699

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1987·No. No. BS-333·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

F.D.E. appeals an order committing him to the custody of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Family Group Home. We reverse.

The sole error urged by F.D.E. is that the trial court did not comply with section 39.09(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1985), insofar as it failed to rank in order of preference the three placement alternatives suggested by H.R.S. We agree and therefore reverse the order, and remand the cause to the court so that it may so rank those options. See R.S. v. State, 414 So.2d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); W.Y. v. State, 414 So.2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WIGGINTON, Judge.

F.D.E. appeals an order committing him to the custody of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Family Group Home. We reverse.

The sole error urged by F.D.E. is that the trial court did not comply with section 39.09(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1985), insofar as it failed to rank in order of preference the three placement alternatives suggested by H.R.S. We agree and therefore reverse the order, and remand the cause to the court so that it may so rank those options. See R.S. v. State, 414 So.2d 660 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); W.Y. v. State, 414 So.2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

In the Interest of F.D.E. v. State, 510 So. 2d 1076, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1827, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9699 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

510 So. 2d 1076 (In the Interest of F.D.E. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related