In the Interest of E.W.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of E.W.

512 S.W.3d 105, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 137, 2017 WL 894495

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 7, 2017

DocketNo. ED104128

StatusPublished

This text of 512 S.W.3d 105 (In the Interest of E.W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of E.W., 512 S.W.3d 105, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 137, 2017 WL 894495 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

E.W. appeals from the trial court’s judgment of the juvenile division of the circuit court finding that he had committed the delinquent act of second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.060, RSMo 2000.¹ We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

E.W. appeals from the trial court’s judgment of the juvenile division of the circuit court finding that he had committed the delinquent act of second-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.060, RSMo 2000.¹ We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

512 S.W.3d 105, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 137, 2017 WL 894495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ew-moctapp-2017.