in the Interest of E.L., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 4, 2009
Docket04-08-00648-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of E.L., Children (in the Interest of E.L., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Interest of E.L., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00648-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.L., et al., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-PA-02435 Honorable Joe Frazier Brown, Jr., Judge Presiding1

Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2009

AFFIRMED

After the trial court terminated her parental rights, Claudia L. appealed the trial court’s order

determining that an appeal of the termination order would be frivolous. See TEX . FAM . CODE ANN .

§ 263.405(g) (Vernon 2002). Claudia’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing

a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be

advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV,

… The Honorable Associate Judge Richard Garcia signed the order being appealed which was adopted by 1

the Honorable Joe Frazier Brown, Jr. 04-08-00648-CV

2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders

procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights) (mem. op.); see also In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d

774 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, order) (same).

Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to Claudia who was advised of her

right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing

the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court

is therefore affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In the Interest of K.M.
98 S.W.3d 774 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Interest of E.L., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-el-children-texapp-2009.