In the Interest of E.C. and L.C., Minor Children
This text of In the Interest of E.C. and L.C., Minor Children (In the Interest of E.C. and L.C., Minor Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 19-1955 Filed April 15, 2020
IN THE INTEREST OF E.C. and L.C., Minor Children,
A.E., Mother, Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Mahaska County, Rose Anne
Mefford, District Associate Judge.
A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to two children.
AFFIRMED.
Eric J. Palmer of Palmer & Palmer, Oskaloosa, for appellant mother.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee State.
Michael S. Fisher of Fisher Law Office, Oskaloosa, attorney and guardian
ad litem for minor children.
Considered by Bower, C.J., Doyle, J., and Mahan, S.J.*
*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206
(2020). 2
MAHAN, Senior Judge.
A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to two children
pursuant to Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(f) and (l) (2019).1 On appeal, the
mother raises two broad claims: “It was not in the children’s best interests to
terminate Mother’s parental rights due to the strong parent/child bond,” and, “The
department failed to make ‘reasonable efforts’ to reunite the Mother with her
children.” She provides no argument or analysis in support of her assertions. Nor
does she point to any facts in the record relative to her claims. See Iowa Rs. App.
P. 6.201(1)(d) (“The petition on appeal shall substantially comply with form 5 in
rule 6.1401.”); 6.1401–Form 5 (“[S]tate what findings of fact or conclusions of law
the district court made with which you disagree and why, generally referencing a
particular part of the record, witnesses’ testimony, or exhibits that support your
position on appeal. . . . General conclusions, such as ‘the trial court’s ruling is not
supported by law or the facts’ are not acceptable.”). The mother has waived error.2
See Iowa R. App. P. 6.903(2)(g)(3); see also In re C.B., 611 N.W.2d 489, 492
(Iowa 2000) (“A broad, all encompassing argument is insufficient to identify error
in cases of de novo review.”); Inghram v. Dairyland Mut. Ins. Co., 215 N.W.2d 239,
240 (Iowa 1974) (“To reach the merits of this case would require us to assume a
partisan role and undertake the appellant’s research and advocacy. This role is
1 The father consented to the termination of his parental rights; he does not appeal. 2 The mother states she “[w]ill supplement in further filings.” Supplementation of a petition on appeal in termination-of-parental-rights cases is not provided for under our appellate rules. See generally Iowa R. App. P. 6.201(1)(b) (“The time for filing a petition on appeal shall not be extended.”), (3) (“If the petition on appeal is not filed with the clerk of the supreme court within 15 days after the filing of a notice of appeal . . . , the supreme court shall dismiss the appeal, and the clerk shall immediately issue procedendo.”). 3
one we refuse to assume.”). We acknowledge the expedited nature of this appeal,
see generally Iowa R. App. P. 6.201, but the mother has failed to provide us
anything to review. Consequently, we affirm the termination of her parental rights.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In the Interest of E.C. and L.C., Minor Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-ec-and-lc-minor-children-iowactapp-2020.