In the Interest of E.B., Minor Child.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Iowa
• Decided: February 21, 2018
• Docket: 17-0651
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 17-0651 Filed February 21, 2018

IN THE INTEREST OF E.B., Minor Child,

E.B., Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Plymouth County, Robert J. Dull,

District Associate Judge.

A child appeals a juvenile court order adjudicating him delinquent for

intimidation with a dangerous weapon. AFFIRMED.

Robert B. Brock II of Law Office of Robert B. Brock II, P.C., Le Mars, for

appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., Mullins, J., and Blane, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2018). 2

MULLINS, Judge.

A child, E.B., appeals a juvenile court order adjudicating him delinquent for

intimidation with a dangerous weapon. He argues the evidence was insufficient

to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the delinquent

act. He specifically contends the State failed to present evidence to establish the

necessary showing that his actions placed someone “in reasonable

apprehension of serious injury.” See Iowa Code § 708.6 (2016).

On December 9, 2016, several students, including E.B., were sitting at a

table together in study hall at their local high school. During the study-hall

period, E.B. advised one of the students sitting at the table, T.H., he was going to

“shoot up the school.” E.B. asked T.H. if he could obtain a gun for him. When

T.H. responded in the negative, E.B. advised he could likely get one from his

brother. T.H. also testified that E.B. advised him at some other time that “he was

going to start in the office so they couldn’t announce that it was happening.” One

of the other students at the study-hall table, B.F., overheard E.B.’s remarks that

he was going to “shoot up the school” and could obtain a gun from his brother.

B.F. was concerned about the statement and believed E.B. was serious. B.F.

sent the school principal an email regarding E.B.’s statement.

The school principal received B.F.’s report later that evening. The

following Monday morning, the principal questioned E.B. about his statement.

E.B. explained B.F. simply overheard him retelling a story about another person’s

statement. The principal took his word for it and took no action. A few days

later, the principal received information from another student that prompted her to

question T.H. Upon being questioned about his previous conversation with E.B. 3

in study hall, T.H. advised the principal that E.B. told him he would shoot up the

school if he could get his hands on a firearm. T.H. noted E.B.’s plan was to start

his attack in the office. The principal and other faculty members subsequently

discussed the allegations with E.B. E.B. admitted that he made the statements

but asserted he was only joking, referring to his statements as “shock humor,

shock comedy.” E.B. also advised the principal: “But if I did bring a gun to school

I would go after the—not my friends, first I would go after the kids I don’t like.”

E.B. was suspended from school, and the principal notified local law

enforcement of the situation. The State ultimately filed a delinquency petition

alleging a violation of Iowa Code section 708.6. Following an adjudication

hearing, the juvenile court adjudicated E.B. delinquent for “threatening to shoot or

discharge a dangerous weapon within an assembly of people or in a building

occupied by another person under circumstances raising a reasonable

expectation the threat will be carried out.” The court placed E.B. on formal

probation. This appeal followed.

Juvenile delinquency proceedings are “special proceedings that serve as

an alternative” to the criminal prosecution of children. In re D.S., 856 N.W.2d

348, 351 (Iowa 2014) (quoting In re J.A.L., 694 N.W.2d 748, 751 (Iowa 2005)).

“We review the sufficiency of the evidence for juvenile adjudications de novo.”

Id. We give weight to the factual findings of the district court, especially

concerning the credibility of witnesses, but we are not bound by them. Id. We

presume the child is innocent “unless the state has proved beyond a reasonable

doubt that the child engaged in” delinquent conduct. Iowa Code § 232.47(10). 4

As noted, E.B. argues the evidence was insufficient to support a finding

beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the delinquent act because the

State failed to present evidence to establish the necessary showing that his

actions placed someone “in reasonable apprehension of serious injury.”

Iowa Code section 708.6 contains two variations of the offense of

intimidation with a dangerous weapon.1 The State alleged, and the juvenile court

found, E.B. committed the variation that, if he were an adult, would amount to a

class “D” felony. That variation provides:

A person commits a class “D” felony when the person shoots, throws, launches, or discharges a dangerous weapon at, into, or in a building, vehicle, airplane, railroad engine, railroad car, or boat, occupied by another person, or within an assembly of people, and thereby places the occupants or people in reasonable apprehension of serious injury or threatens to commit such an act under circumstances raising a reasonable expectation that the threat will be carried out.

Id. § 708.6 (emphasis added). This variation provides two alternatives for a

criminal conviction or delinquency adjudication—a person commits intimidation

with a dangerous weapon when the person either (1) “shoots, throws, launches,

or discharges a dangerous weapon at, into, or in a building . . . occupied by

another person, or within an assembly of other people, and thereby places the

occupants or people in reasonable apprehension of serious injury” or (2)

“threatens to commit such an act under circumstances raising a reasonable

expectation that the threat will be carried out.” See id.; see also State v. Vavrik,

336 N.W.2d 193, 194 (Iowa 1983) (indicating the class “D” felony variation

1 This offense was previously entitled “Terrorism.” See Iowa Code § 708.6 (2001). In 2002, the legislature changed the name of the offense to “Intimidation with a dangerous weapon.” See 2002 Iowa Acts ch. 1075, § 8. 5

includes two alternatives and referring to the latter as the “threatening”

alternative); State v. Jennings, No. 14-2098, 2016 WL 3269545, at *4 (Iowa Ct.

App. June 15, 2016) (“There are two alternatives in the statute—shooting or

discharging a dangerous weapon within an assembly of people, or threatening to

shoot or discharge a dangerous weapon within an assembly of people.”); State v.

Anderson, No. 14-0423, 2015 WL 799788, at *2–5 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2015)

(considering a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim under the threatening

alternative); cf. State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 699 (Iowa 2014) (noting the class

“C” felony variation of the offense includes a threatening alternative). E.B.’s

delinquency adjudication was based on the latter alternative, which does not

require a showing that his actions placed someone “in reasonable apprehension

of serious injury.” See Iowa Code § 708.6.

E.B. does not challenge the State’s establishment of the elements for the

alternative he was adjudicated delinquent under, the so-called threatening

alternative. Upon our de novo review, we conclude the threatening alternative

was supported by sufficient evidence to find beyond a reasonable doubt E.B.

committed a delinquent act and therefore affirm E.B.’s delinquency adjudication.

AFFIRMED.