in the Interest of E. R. Jr. Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services
This text of in the Interest of E. R. Jr. Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services (in the Interest of E. R. Jr. Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued December 16, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00756-CV ——————————— IN THE INTEREST OF E.R., CHILD
On Appeal from the 313th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-04368J
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Qouwanna Howard, has neither paid the required fees nor
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;
see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West
2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the
Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16,
2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for
preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that
this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of
prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Massengale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of E. R. Jr. Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-e-r-jr-child-v-department-of-fa-texapp-2014.