In the Interest of D.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In the Interest of D.W. v. State

570 So. 2d 1155, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9583, 1990 WL 205506

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1990

DocketNo. 90-0581

StatusPublished

This text of 570 So. 2d 1155 (In the Interest of D.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Interest of D.W. v. State, 570 So. 2d 1155, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9583, 1990 WL 205506 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant/appellant, D.W., was charged with throwing a deadly missile. At the close of the state’s case the defendant moved for an acquittal on the basis that the state failed to prove that venue was in Broward County. The trial court reopened the case to allow in additional evidence concerning venue. Subsequently D.W. was adjudicated a delinquent and the trial court imposed a condition of community control which required that D.W. not cause himself to be arrested. D.W. appeals. The state concedes that the provi[1156]*1156sion regarding community control was error pursuant to In re A.R., 554 So.2d 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We affirm the adjudication of delinquency and vacate the provision of community control which requires that D.W. not get himself arrested.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant/appellant, D.W., was charged with throwing a deadly missile. At the close of the state’s case the defendant moved for an acquittal on the basis that the state failed to prove that venue was in Broward County. The trial court reopened the case to allow in additional evidence concerning venue. Subsequently D.W. was adjudicated a delinquent and the trial court imposed a condition of community control which required that D.W. not cause himself to be arrested. D.W. appeals. The state concedes that the provi[1156]*1156sion regarding community control was error pursuant to In re A.R., 554 So.2d 640 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We affirm the adjudication of delinquency and vacate the provision of community control which requires that D.W. not get himself arrested.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 So. 2d 1155, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9583, 1990 WL 205506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-dw-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack