in the Interest of D.W., a Child

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in the Interest of D.W., a Child. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9170
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 29, 2014·No. 05-14-00302-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 29, 2014

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00302-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.M.W., K.W., K.W., B.W., AND A.W., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12-1043-W

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright In a letter dated April 15, 2014, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal.

Specifically, there does not appear to be a final judgment. We instructed appellant to file a letter

brief addressing our concern and gave appellee an opportunity to respond. Appellant filed a

jurisdictional brief. Appellee did not file a response.

Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that

disposes of all pending parties and claims. See id.

In his notice of appeal, appellant stated that he was appealing the trial court’s February

24, 2014 judgment terminating his parental rights to his children. Because this judgment was not

included in the clerk’s record, the Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the judgment or written verification that no such judgment existed. The Court received written verification from the District Clerk that no such

judgment existed.

In his jurisdictional brief, appellant states the trial court erred by not placing the children

in his custody. He also states that he is seeking to remove his case to federal court. Appellant

failed to address this Court’s jurisdictional concern as to the absence of a final judgment. The

record before this Court does not contain a final judgment. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal

for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

140302F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF D.W., R.M.W., On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District K.W., K.W., B.W., AND A.W., Children Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. 12-1043-W. No. 05-14-00302-CV Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Brown, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, the Dallas County Child Protective Services Unit of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant, Moses Watts, Jr.

Judgment entered May 29, 2014

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in the Interest of D.W., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in the Interest of D.W., a Child (in the Interest of D.W., a Child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)