In the Interest of D.P.P.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of D.P.P.

393 S.W.3d 140, 2013 WL 815930, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 280

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In the Interest of D.P.P.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1597 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 2013·No. No. ED 98470·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

D.W. (“Mother”) appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights to D.P.P. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

D.W. (“Mother”) appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights to D.P.P. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of D.P.P., 393 S.W.3d 140, 2013 WL 815930, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

393 S.W.3d 140 (In the Interest of D.P.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.