in the Interest of D.M.B, D.M.B. and D.M.B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services
This text of in the Interest of D.M.B, D.M.B. and D.M.B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services (in the Interest of D.M.B, D.M.B. and D.M.B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 21, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00377-CV ——————————— IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.B., D.M.B., AND D.M.B., Children
On Appeal from the 313th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-01268J
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The appellant, D.M.B., timely filed a notice of appeal on May 6, 2014, from
the trial court’s final decree terminating her parental rights to the three minor
children made the subject of this suit. On the same day, appellant also filed a
motion for new trial. On July 15, 2014, the Clerk of this Court filed a Notice
directing the district court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the order regarding appellant’s motion for new trial. On July 28, 2014, the trial court
clerk filed a compliant supplemental clerk’s record containing the order on
appellant’s motion for new trial. The trial court granted the motion for new trial on
May 8, 2014, which may have rendered this appeal moot. Cf. TEX. R. APP. P.
21.9(b) (“Granting a new trial restores the case to its position before the former
trial . . . .”).
On July 31, 2014, the Clerk of this Court issued a Notice that this Court may
dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response within
10 days of the Notice explaining how this Court had jurisdiction over this appeal.
Appellant did not timely respond to the Notice.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c). We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of D.M.B, D.M.B. and D.M.B. v. Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-dmb-dmb-and-dmb-v-department-of-texapp-2014.