In the Interest of D.H.

250 S.W.3d 837, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 584
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 2008·No. No. ED 89757·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the judgment of the family court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor children D.H., (D.O.B. 9/4/02), D.W., (D.O.B. [838]*83811/7/98), and T.H. (D.O.B. 6/15/01),1 pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo 2000.2

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The family court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. In the Interest of P.D., 144 S.W.3d 907, 910 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Interest of D.H., 250 S.W.3d 837, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 584 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

250 S.W.3d 837 (In the Interest of D.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Dh
250 S.W.3d 837 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)