In the Interest of D.G.

958 A.2d 1041, 598 Pa. 550, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1767

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 2008·No. Appeal No. 230 EAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED and the matter is to be SUBMITTED on briefs. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the lower court commit error when it affirmed the trial court’s finding of adjudication of delinquency despite a complete lack of evidence to support the conviction and the District Attorney’s office [concedes] as much?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED and the matter is to be SUBMITTED on briefs. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the lower court commit error when it affirmed the trial court’s finding of adjudication of delinquency despite a complete lack of evidence to support the conviction and the District Attorney’s office [concedes] as much?

In the Interest of D.G., 958 A.2d 1041, 598 Pa. 550, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1767 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

958 A.2d 1041 (In the Interest of D.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.