In the Interest of D.D.C. v. Carter

Missouri Court of Appeals

In the Interest of D.D.C. v. Carter

360 S.W.3d 929, 2012 WL 788072, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 303

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 13, 2012·No. WD 73881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Whipple appeals a judgment entered by the Family Court Division of the Jackson County Circuit Court, awarding him attorneys’ fees of $7,000 in a contested termination of parental rights and adoption case, in which he represented the *930 natural father. The circuit court denied Whipple’s request for additional fees and expenses. He now appeals, arguing that the circuit court abused its discretion in denying substantial portions of his fee request. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David Whipple appeals a judgment entered by the Family Court Division of the Jackson County Circuit Court, awarding him attorneys’ fees of $7,000 in a contested termination of parental rights and adoption case, in which he represented the *930 natural father. The circuit court denied Whipple’s request for additional fees and expenses. He now appeals, arguing that the circuit court abused its discretion in denying substantial portions of his fee request. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

In the Interest of D.D.C. v. Carter, 360 S.W.3d 929, 2012 WL 788072, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 303 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

360 S.W.3d 929 (In the Interest of D.D.C. v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related