in the Interest of D. H., a Child

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Interest of D. H., a Child

DecidedJune 8, 2006

Docket13-05-00780-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Interest of D. H., a Child (in the Interest of D. H., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Interest of D. H., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER13-05-780-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF D.H., A CHILD

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, MANUELA GALARZA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the36th District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-04-1506-CV-A. The clerk=s record was filed on March 27, 2006. The reporter=s record was filed on April 4, 2006. Appellant=s brief was due on April 24, 2006. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant=s failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On May 11, 2006, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court=s notice, and appellant=s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 8th day of June, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER13-05-780-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF D.H., A CHILD

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, MANUELA GALARZA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the36th District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-04-1506-CV-A. The clerk=s record was filed on March 27, 2006. The reporter=s record was filed on April 4, 2006. Appellant=s brief was due on April 24, 2006. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant=s failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On May 11, 2006, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant=s failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court=s notice, and appellant=s failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 8th day of June, 2006

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Interest of D. H., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-d-h-a-child-texapp-2006.