In the Interest of CMP

608 So. 2d 568, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11750, 1992 WL 338525
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 19, 1992
Docket92-00935
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 608 So. 2d 568 (In the Interest of CMP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interest of CMP, 608 So. 2d 568, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11750, 1992 WL 338525 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

608 So.2d 568 (1992)

In the Interest of C.M.P., a child.

No. 92-00935.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 19, 1992.

Reese A. Waters, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Carol H. Yearwood, Jacksonville, for appellee Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services.

Tracy S. Carlin of Foley & Lardner, Jacksonville, for appellee Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final order terminating parental rights. Only one issue merits discussion. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to make findings with regard to the best interest of the child as required by section 39.467(2), Florida Statutes.

The court's order terminating parental rights states that it is "manifestly in the best interest of the child that parental rights be terminated and that the child be permanently committed for subsequent *569 adoption." However, the order does not indicate that the trial court considered or evaluated all of the factors delineated in section 39.467(2)(a)-(k), Florida Statutes, in reaching the determination that termination of parental rights was in the manifest best interest of the child. In In re Interest of B.T., 597 So.2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), this court held that reversal is required where the statutory factors of section 39.467(2), Florida Statutes, are not considered. Our review of the record indicates that most of the factors of section 39.467(2) were considered by the trial court. However, we find no basis on which we could find that the trial court considered factor (2)(d) of section 39.467.

Accordingly, we must reverse the order terminating parental rights, and remand the case for entry of an order containing the necessary findings of fact.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

To v. LS
954 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
State, Department of Children & Family Services v. J.A.
701 So. 2d 657 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Tc v. Department of Health & Rehab.
681 So. 2d 893 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Im v. State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services
668 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 568, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11750, 1992 WL 338525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-cmp-fladistctapp-1992.